Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
August 30, 2008
Image Size
609 KB
Resolution
1024×544
Thumb

Stats

Views
346 (1 today)
Favourites
9 (who?)
Comments
13
Downloads
17

Camera Data

Make
OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Model
E-3
Shutter Speed
1/8 second
Aperture
F/3.5
Focal Length
12 mm
ISO Speed
640
Date Taken
Aug 23, 2008, 7:41:04 PM
×
Chevy Wagoon by Swanee3 Chevy Wagoon by Swanee3
Playing Now; Racer X - Bucket Of Rocks



:icondonotplz::iconusemyartplz:
Add a Comment:
 
:iconquanticchaos1000:
QuanticChaos1000 Featured By Owner Sep 4, 2008  Hobbyist Photographer
Not a bad lookinf 57, I wonder how many people think it's a Nomad?
Reply
:iconswanee3:
Swanee3 Featured By Owner Sep 4, 2008  Professional Photographer
I see one so far.....;)
Reply
:iconquanticchaos1000:
QuanticChaos1000 Featured By Owner Sep 4, 2008  Hobbyist Photographer
I saw that too, but I'm not sure what is worse, pointing out to them their mistake....or not? :XD:

It's not as bad as when people call any pre 1935 car a model T, I want to smack them!
Reply
:iconswanee3:
Swanee3 Featured By Owner Sep 5, 2008  Professional Photographer
:slap:
Reply
:iconosagelady:
osagelady Featured By Owner Aug 31, 2008  Hobbyist Photographer
Ohhhhhh she's lovely!!! :love:
Reply
:iconswanee3:
Swanee3 Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2008  Professional Photographer
oh yeah...:nod: that she is.
Reply
:iconazzurro360:
azzurro360 Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2008
Most wagons I don't like but Nomads are the exception
Reply
:iconswanee3:
Swanee3 Featured By Owner Sep 3, 2008  Professional Photographer
hehehe...:ahoy:
Reply
:icontaraakian:
Taraakian Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2008
I've never found station wagons to be appealing. I guess the newer chrysler ones aren't bad, but anything pre 2000 is generally hideous to me. Although the older -50s ones are better than 70-80s.
Reply
:iconswanee3:
Swanee3 Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2008  Professional Photographer
I believe wagons had there bad years depending on there make and model. This one is a 1957.
Reply
Add a Comment: